BT to buy Plus Net

November 16th, 2006

In a move that has been anticipated by broadband industry watchers, according to ZDNet, BT is to pay £67m for Plus Net, one of the few remaining independent Internet Service Providers (ISPs). The CRM computer system which Plus Net credits with its service standards may be the real prize that BT is buying, rather than the ISPs 200,000 subscribers.

Plus Net was once considerered to be one the superior internet providers, however customers have noticed the standard of service slip of late. Incidents such as the accidential deletion of 700Gb of customers’ emails certainly haven’t helped the company’s reputation.

Will customers stay with Plus Net once the handover is complete?

Windows Vista won’t need anti-virus says co-President

November 12th, 2006

Can Microsoft Windows Vista run virus-free? The answer is “Yes”, according to Jim Allchin, co-President of the Redmond firm. Zdnet, citing betanews, reports Allchin’s claim that his 11 year old son has been using a Vista machine sans anti-virus without trouble.

Meanwhile, some 3rd party security software vendors such as McAfee and Symantec have voiced concern over the Patchguard kernel protection technology introduced by Microsoft in the new operation system, claiming that the new system effectively locks them out of providing anti-virus solutions for Vista. However, as TheRegister reports, other vendors such as Kaspersky Labs have no issue with the new technology.

Will Windows Vista eliminate computer viruses? Care to place any money on that?

UPDATE: 13/11/06

Jim Allchin has posted an entry at WindowsVistaBlog.com where he explains that some quotes were taken out of context. One wonders what the online stories got right – his son is 7 years old, not 11, and he was only using the example of his son to demonstrate that in certain restricted conditions (i.e. a locked down PC), Vista can operate happily without ant-virus software. As for the idea that Vista won’t need anti-virus software, says Mr Allchin:

“I want to be clear, most users will use some form of antivirus software, and that will be appropriate for their scenarios. In fact, Windows Security Center, a great feature in Windows Vista, specifically encourages the use of antivirus software.”

Which Magazine: Don’t use PC World for repairs

November 12th, 2006

For reliable PC repairs and support, it seems that nothing beats the more independent providers, like Support Lounge Computer Services.

As reported by TheRegister and other publications:

Consumer magazine Computing Which? carried out an undercover investigation of independent and major stores that offer a computer repair service.

It targeted PC World because it’s the only major store that offers to fix computers even if not originally purchased at one of its stores.

The magazine’s researchers deliberately “broke” computers in order to assess the level of service at various repair centres across the UK.

On half of the computers they simply deleted a Windows start up file to prevent the operating system from er, starting. On the remaining computers they loosened a hard disk cable.

The “faulty” computers were then taken along to a total of 20 PC repairers and the results of the investigation showed that the independent stores performed much better than big boys PC World.

Diagnosis of the faults at PC World ranged from reinstalling Windows to advising the “customer” to replace their computer. In some instances the reinstallation led to personal data being lost as work had not been backed up.

Repair costs also varied wildly at PC World between £69.99 and a staggering £350.

On the whole, independent stores provided a better service according to the report, with more accurate diagnosis and repair costs typically lower than PC World.

In the report, Computing Which? advised its readers not to go to PC World if they need to get their computer repaired. The magazine’s editor said: “We think that they [PC World] should overhaul their training – they could learn a lot from independent retailers.”

A PC World spokeswoman said the Which? report was not representative of the level of service and expertise offered by the chain.

“PC World’s skilled engineers have fixed more than two million PC problems for customers in the last year, and in nine of 10 PC repairs there was no requirement to fit a spare part,” she said.

She says the Which? visits preceeded “an extensive overhaul of our national support operation, including our services for customers in-store”.

“We’d like to stress that our pricing for all services is transparent, and we always discuss the potential cost with customers prior to carrying out any installation or repair service. In many, if not most cases, the actual cost is considerably lower than the initial estimate.”

What’s happened to Carphone Warehouse, Charles?

September 3rd, 2006

Customers of Carphone Warehouse (CW) may not realise that the company started life as a couple of concessions within large office supply superstores in London. As the company grew, and opened its own standalone branches it stressed its excellence in employee knowledge and customer service. However the standard of service provided by Carphone Warehouse today is indistinguishable from many other lousy organisations that epitomise the crappy British service sector.

This is no surprise to many of Carphone Warehouse’s customers, including Shirley Greening-Jackson. As reported by today’s Mail on Sunday, Mrs Greening-Jackson discovered that CW has adopted a policy of “no over-70s” for their TalkTalk broadband product, at least if they are unaccompanied by a younger member of their family.

A CW spokeswoman said that the discretionary policy was instituted in response to accusations that the company had mis-sold its products last year, presumably to more mature members of society. Sadly it didn’t instead choose to better train its staff so that they could explain the terms and conditions of their products to its customers in a clear and simple fashion.

As Mrs Greening-Jackson put it,

“Somebody has decided when you turn 70 you lose a lot of your mind. I find this is ridiculous.”

TalkTalk has come under fire for its poor service levels since it began offering its free broadband product earlier this year. Customers have waited months for their activation and welcome packs, only to be fobbed off by customer service staff when they eventually get through a TalkTalk call centre. Requests for a refund for service not provided are laughed off, according to one Support Lounge customer who realises that he made a mistake choosing the free broadband offer instead of paying for his service from a reliable provider.

Responding to complaints about the service from TalkTalk, CW founder and boss Charles Dunstone promised earlier this year that customer service staffing numbers would be increased to around 2,200 by this month, September, but had not made any pledges to improve the underlying processes which have caused such abysmal service in the first place.

Unlike other company bosses like Philip Green of BHS and the former chairmen of Marks and Spencer (M&S), for whom regular visits to their various branches were and are vitally important to their continued success, Charles Dunstone appears to be a Chief Executive in absentia. Aside from his latest of blog entries declaring that all is well, there has been little to indicate that Mr Dunstone actually understands how infuriating it is deal with his company, or that he ever visits his own stores.

Go shopping at Carphone Warehouse, Charles. Knowing the standard of staff at your branches, it’s doubtful they’d recognise you, so you’d experience what everyone else does – crappy service.

Free broadband – don’t get caught in the stampede

July 24th, 2006

It’s been a wild few months in the UK broadband industry. Only last week Sky threw its hat into the ring by offering a basic level of free broadband to its satellite TV subscribers. After all the initial hype. some questions are now being asked about whether such an offering is sustainable, and who the losers might be.

Since Carphone Warehouse’s TalkTalk announced its “free broadband forever” in April, it has struggled to keep up with demand From the outset of the TalkTalk offer, our customers have asked us if it was a good deal. And our response has been the same throughout:

You don’t get something for nothing. If your current broadband provider wants £15 a month to provide your broadband service and the infrastructure to deal with your queries and problems, how much investment do you think TalkTalk is making in the service department if they’re giving you broadband for free?

Of course it is a little more complex than that, because TalkTalk are providing these “free” broadband connections through Local Loop Unbundling (LLU), which means that they control the piece of wire between your premises and the telephone exchange instead of BT. This does allow them to save some money, but when things go wrong it’s not hard to see where the other savings lie.

One customer of ours waited 2 months for his welcome pack from TalkTalk, which included his modem. His request for a refund for the unusuable months fell on deaf ears. This is just the tip of the iceberg – consider the number of calls our customer made over the 2 months chasing his welcome pack.

According to the Sunday Times, TalkTalk is recruiting and training call centre staff as fast as it can, and hopes to have 2200 by September. That’s a lot of staff just answering the phone. Would they need so many if their systems were up to the job in the first place? Take our customer with the missing welcome pack. Would TalkTalk need to answer his repeated calls if it had just got his account dealt with in the first place?

TalkTalk has signed up 400,000 new customers since it launched its free broadband offer. Sky’s announcement last week, as well as Orange’s joining the scrum, has certainly moved the market to compete on price, or lack thereof.

Sky’s offering has a differentiating factor. They can provide an engineer to install broadband for you, albeit at a price. Will Sky invest enough in their self-help provisioning for customers so that they don’t resent forking out for a man in a van?

The broadband market has certainly been shaken up recently, but don’t count out the fee charging incumbents. Those customers who switch to a free alternative may be desperate enough to buy themselves out of their 18 month contracts and jump back into a subscription model if they are continually let down by a lack of service from the free alterantives.

See also

Broadband Rush May End In Bloodbath

Can’t open addresses in IE – KB908531 – MS06-015

April 16th, 2006

I received a call from a customer around lunchtime today.

For some reason, they couldn’t open any websites, yet for some reason their PC was still opening his default homepage without any problems.

The quick indicator to the problem was several instances of verclsid.exe in Task Manager.

A google search quickly identified that this file was connected with a recent Microsoft Windows Update, KB908531 which is supposed to help verify ActiveX controls and close a security loophole.

However, it seems that the patch was very poorly written and also succeeds in preventing Windows users from accessing websites and network resources correctly.

Some comments suggest that it may be connected with HP equipment or software. This may have been the case with our client earlier today, who has an HP scanner.

The advice provided by others online certainly helped to identify the problem, a bad Windows update – and the consequent solution, remove said update, however there doesn’t seem to be any word yet on a permanent solution.

The post on the IE6 newsgroup (see quote below) is of little use for those who want to see this issue resolved.

Our advice to our customers for the moment is to surf the web sensibly and to miss out update KB908531.

We’ve determined that the majority of the issues people are having with
MS06-015 / KB908531 are due to a bad interaction between the security update
and a software component included with various HP hardware devices,
including but not limited to printers, scanners, and cameras.

Here are two fixes which should fix problems caused by the interaction with
the HP software:

Option 1 – Modify the registry
——————————

- (If you have multiple user accounts set up) Log onto the computer using an
account with Administrator privileges

- Click the Start button, then click Run and type “regedit” at the prompt,
without the quotes; this will start Registry Editor

- Locate the
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINESOFTWAREMicrosoftWindows
CurrentVersionShellExtensionsCached key in Registry Editor

- Right click on the key and select New / DWORD Value

- Rename the resulting value “{A4DF5659-0801-4A60-9607-1C48695EFDA9}
{000214E6-0000-0000-C000-000000000046} 0×401″, without the quotes

- Right click the value, select Modify, and type “1″ into the Value Data
field

- Close Registry Editor

Option 2 – Kill the HP process
——————————

- Wait until Internet Explorer, Windows Explorer, or whichever component is
encountering problems is in an unresponsive state

- Click the Start button, then select Run and type “taskmgr” at the prompt,
without the quotes; this will start Task Manager

- Locate any instances of hpgs2wnd.exe or hpgs2wnf.exe in Task Manager, then
right click on them and select End Process

Notes:

- Option 2 this may disable some HP device-specific functionality until you
restart your computer.

- Option 2 will correct the problem for the logged-in user, but not for all
users on a computer with multiple user accounts. For that reason, Option 1
is the preferred option.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If your computer is not currently unresponsive, you should only have to do
Option 1 or Option 2, not both. If your computer is currently unresponsive,
you should be fixed by doing Option 2.

I’m very sorry about the inconvenience this has caused you all; hopefully
this will get things back on track. Please note that MS06-015 fixes a
critical security vulnerability, so it’s very important that you reinstall
it as soon as possible if you’ve uninstalled it. Please also keep in mind
that disabling Auto Update will leave your computer unprotected even after
we release security updates. I understand that this experience has been
very frustrating for many of you, but I really must still strongly recommend
that you leave [Automatic Updates] enabled for your own safety.

http://groups.google.com/group/
microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6.browser/msg/094143b42d0c3ca2

Update: 28/4/06

Microsoft is to release a new version of its patch, in order to patch the previous one.

If you had downloaded the problematic patch, the new one will be automatically downloaded and applied.

More information at ZDNet.